Teachers face constant pressure to move through a packed curriculum, even when some students haven’t mastered the material. The typical response is to keep going. But a first-grade teacher team in one school decided to stop, go back, and spend three weeks reteaching a writing standard — and administrators backed them up.
When Teachers Decide to Pause
The team noticed a problem after an early formative writing assessment. Students were asked to write three sentences on a given topic. In several classrooms, lots of students met or exceeded the standard. But as a full grade level, none of the multilingual learners or students with disabilities demonstrated mastery. Only 37 percent of all first graders passed.
The teachers met and discussed next steps. They couldn’t ignore the large gap. They reminded each other that first grade is the foundation. “If not us, then who?” they said. The team approached their principal and academic coach with a plan that would take longer than usual. The administration, which preaches collective responsibility, supported the idea.
Related: Claim Evidence Reasoning Key to Science Inquiry
A Team Approach to Revisiting Writing Standards
The teachers tore up the old rubric and built a new Google Sheet listing every first-grade student. They isolated each section of the writing rubric instead of relying on a total score. After analyzing the data, they grouped students by specific need: some needed help writing a complete sentence, others needed punctuation reminders, and some needed support with planning and using a thinking map. The already-proficient students also needed enrichment.
Collective efficacy — believing every team member can be effective — guided the work. Teachers whose students scored highest on the initial assessment took the lowest-performing students. The groups weren’t even in size. As the team reminded each other, it wasn’t about fairness; it was about equity. Enrichment groups had about 30 students, while the lower-performing group had 10 students.
Data-Driven Grouping and Instruction
For three weeks, each group had a different goal and scope. One teacher focused on letter spacing and formation. Another used “spicy” sentences with adjectives to engage her group. A third teacher used thinking maps to help students create compound sentences, giving them confidence and agency.
Related: Department of Education probes Smith College over trans women admissions
The teacher leading the lowest-performing group, who wrote the original account, built structured mini-lessons around complete sentences and punctuation. She connected writing prompts to students’ interests — lots of talk about food and animals. Students diagrammed sentences with Post-it Notes, moving nouns, verbs, and adjectives around. This active approach helped them focus on syntax rather than handwriting.
Results After Three Weeks
After three weeks, students returned to their original classrooms and took the same writing assessment. Scores jumped across the grade level. Students who couldn’t write a sentence before were writing with ease. Mastery among multilingual learners and students with disabilities rose to 30 percent. The overall grade-level mastery went from 37 percent to 70 percent.
Students told their teachers they enjoyed meeting a new teacher and learning new skills. The teacher still has students from her group who ask when they can come back for more writing lessons.
Related: Buying Managed WordPress Hosting? Here’s What You Need to Know!
Advice for Other Teacher Teams
The teacher team offered several recommendations. Silos in education only serve a select group, they said. Setting clear boundaries and norms before meetings helped build trust. Their norms included being positive and productive, being prepared and present, and celebrating small wins.
Collective planning is more than worksheets and to-do lists, they noted. The team collected writing samples weekly, allowing them to see errors and adjust instruction before the final assessment. Open dialogue helped them try strategies they wouldn’t have considered alone.
At a recent conference, author and teacher Sarah Brown Wessling told educators to be part of a constellation, not the “star.” The teacher team said that’s a helpful perspective for any group embarking on an ambitious reteaching plan.
Leave a Reply